that GREEN blog

Nonpartisan Campaign Aims to Put Clean Energy, Green Jobs on the Agenda in 2008 Election

Spearheaded by the Energy Action Coalition, “Power Vote” is a national non-partisan initiative to elevate the issue of the climate crisis this election season. Power Vote aims to unite one million young “climate voters” behind a platform centered on combating global warming pollution, creating millions of new green jobs, and ensuring our nation’s energy independence by transitioning to a dynamic new clean energy economy. For more information about the platform go to www.powervote.org/platform.

“Young people recognize that the 2008 election is critical for the planet.. They are the ones standing up and demanding that Washington act swiftly before climate change spirals out of humanity’s control,” asserts James Hansen, a leading scientist on climate change. “Power Vote represents hope for our future at a time when our climate is at an ominous tipping point.”

The November election looms large for college students returning to school this month. As they head to the polls in record numbers, many for the first time, it is the global climate crisis, the country’s increasing economic insecurity, and a war with no end in sight that rank as their highest voting priorities.

By the November election, the Energy Action Coalition and its more than forty partner organizations will mobilize young ‘climate voters’ to take the Power Vote Pledge to “vote for clean and just energy” when they go to the polls. The campaign kicks off with organizers working on over 300 college campuses in at least 37 states and 123 congressional districts.

“Students nationwide are rising to the challenge of climate change and transforming our campuses into models of sustainability,” says Reagan Richmond, a senior at University of Tennessee- Knoxville. “It’s past time policymakers followed our example! With Power Vote, we’re putting Washington on notice that we’ll be holding them accountable for addressing this crisis at the ballot box and beyond.”

The next eight weeks will see an intensive grassroots effort as organizers engage in millions of face to face conversations with young people across the country – storming campuses, addressing thousands of classes, meetings students at bars and concerts – and showing up at candidates events making the youth position on climate clear. Power Voters will mobilize young people for the Green Jobs Now National Day of Action on September 27th, make their presence felt at the Presidential and Vice Presidential debates, and work around the clock getting out the vote in the days leading up to the election.

“Young people are successfully fighting for a clean energy future on their campuses and in their communities,” says Jessy Tolkan, Co-Director for the Energy Action Coalition. “As we head to the polls in record numbers this November young people want an economy that moves us beyond dangerous, dirty energy, creates green jobs for all, and secures our climate—that’s what we’ll be voting for.”

“Youth in our community need the opportunity to better their futures through the development of Green Jobs and Green Careers,” notes Desire Grover, a community organizer in Chester, PA. “A new clean energy economy has the potential to lift people out of poverty and into the middle class. We’re reaching out to young workers in our community to take the Power Vote Pledge and tell Washington that we want green jobs now!”

For more information, contact Brianna Cayo Cotter at 415.305.1943 and visit PowerVote.org.

The Energy Action Coalition unites 48 organizations, over 600 local groups, and tens of thousands of young people in 56 states and provinces in an alliance that supports and strengthens the clean energy movement among students and young people in the United States and Canada. The partners of Energy Action work together to build a clean, efficient, just and renewable energy future.

One of my main messages for advocates is “make the ask.” In my opinion it is almost always a waste of time to talk to an elected official without asking for something.

Believe it or not, though, people have actually had the audacity to disagree with me on this. I know, it shocked me as well . I’ve listened to the critics and I’m here to say, well, they’re partially right (see, I listen to other people despite what my husband says). But I still stand by my “make the ask” advice. Let me explain what I mean.

First, though, before I get too much in to it, perhaps I should explain what I mean by “make the ask.” Simply put, advocates should ask for something specific as opposed to simply trying to “educate” or “inform” elected officials. Frankly, trying to educate elected officials without asking for something specific is like trying to educate a middle-schooler without telling them it will be on the test. It goes in one ear and out the other.

Those who disagree with this advice usually have something to say along the following lines: either they believe they’ll “get more attention if they don’t ask (since everyone else is);” they “just want to say thank you;” or they’ve “already asked and don’t want to be a pest.” These criticisms sound perfectly reasonable and in many cases are partially true. Let’s examine each in more detail.

“Everyone’s always asking. I’ll get more attention if I don’t”

Unfortunately, if you use all your time with an elected official to just say nice things, you won’t get their attention over the long term – and you’ll probably be ignored. I’m really sorry to have to put it that way, but it’s true. Yes, it’s nice for the legislator to have a meeting with someone who “isn’t always asking for something.” It’s even nicer for the legislator to have a meeting with someone who asks “how can I help you on your issues?” — and I’m not in anyway suggesting that these questions should not be a part of your message.

That said, “making the ask” flips that switch in an elected official’s brain that says “hey, I better pay attention to what this person is saying.” It achieves that goal far more effectively than a polite “I don’t really need anything right now, I just thought I’d stop by.” The good news is that if you’re feeling non-aggressive, you can ask for something easy that, and here’s the key, provides the legislator with as much benefit as it does you! Here are some examples of what I mean:

* A site visit: Ask your elected officials to visit a facility in the district, perhaps a place where they can meet with constituents and be seen in a positive light in the media. You’re helping them connect with people in the community, and you’ve made an “ask.” In this case, the ask is “will you come and visit us in the district?” One of our lobby clients used this technique to approach members of Congress who would normally be, shall we say, a little skeptical of their views. By asking for something easy, like a site visit, instead of launching immediately in to a hard policy ask, these advocates have been able to build positive relationships with their legislators that will serve them well when the hard policy issues arise.

* A statement of support: Perhaps your elected official would be willing to make a public statement of support, either in writing or by making a speech. This can be especially useful when it’s connected to a “hook” of some sort. So, for example, if it’s National “hug a puppy” week, the elected official can make a statement about how wonderful it is to hug puppies – and you can be sure the media is there to get a picture of the puppy hugging activity (my puppy is available if needed). The ask, in this case, is “will you make a statement in support of ‘hug a puppy’ week?” And be sure to follow-up with all the talking points and other materials to make this happen. (hey, can we start a “hug a puppy” week?)

* An article for your newsletter: For advocates affiliated with a state or community organization that puts together a newsletter, asking your elected officials to write an article for that newsletter can be a great way of getting their attention. Most elected officials welcome the opportunity to put their name in front of their constituents, and your request that they post something in your publication will require them to think about your cause. In addition, if they agree to write the article (or, in most cases, to review the article you have drafted for them and agree to sign their name to it) they will almost always want to speak positively about your issue. That makes it much harder for them to vote against you should the time ever come.

In essence, these “relationship building asks” help you set the stage for future, sometimes more difficult or more controversial, policy asks. They are an ideal way to capture a legislator’s attention without being too pushy.

“I don’t want to ask: I just want to say “thank you”"

I heard a variation of this from a legislator who was also speaking at one of the conferences at which I was presenting. In fact, the legislator went on right before me and told the attendees that they should do nothing but thank the legislature for all the support for their issue and that there was no need to ask for anything specific. I was in a bit of an awkward position as I, well, completely disagreed.

Now, don’t get me wrong. My mother raised me right. I do believe that we should all say “thank you” as frequently as possible. And if you’re communicating with your elected officials frequently (say once per month or more) go ahead and use up one of those communications as a pure and simple thank you.

However, in this case the advice was directed at a group of people who talked to their representatives once-per-year. In these situations, while a thank you is a great way to start out, it should be accompanied with an “ask,” even if it’s one of the easy asks noted above. Without that ask (and the required follow-up on the ask), those lobby day participants would probably not have found any other occasions to talk to their legislators at any other point through the year.

“I already asked and I didn’t get an answer. They know what I want. I don’t want to ask again.”

This one really irritates me. The whole purpose of an ask is to eventually get an answer, right? Sure it’s frustrating when our elected officials don’t respond to our “asks” as quickly as we’d like. Why does that happen? Usually it’s for one of three reasons. Either:

* the elected official simply forgot about the request — with dozens of requests a day, this happens often. * the elected official hasn’t had time to form an opinion on your question * the elected official is waiting to see how much you really want what you’re asking for

All of these problems can be solved by asking again. I recognize that it might take months or even years to get a straight answer out of a member of Congress, state legislator or even city council member. But you sure won’t get one at all if you don’t ask again. Giving up after the first or second try just makes it way too easy on them.

When it comes down to the bottom line, elected officials and their staff expect you to eventually present them with an issue and a specific solution to that issue. Otherwise, why are you communicating with them? I can’t think how many times as a legislative staff person I had meetings I just thought were a complete waste of time because no one asked me for anything.

So how are the critics partially right? Well, I guess if you’re communicating with your elected officials frequently then you can afford to spend some of those communications on the niceties. And since everyone SHOULD be communicating frequently with their elected officials, then we all should be spending time on the niceties. But in the real world, where we might reach out a couple times per year, making the ask is an essential component of getting what we want from our government. And isn’t that what it’s all about?

Author Stephanie Vance, the Advocacy Guru at Advocacy Associates, works with organizations that want to impact public policy through effective advocacy techniques. She offers training and consulting services on getting government to listen and can be found on the web at http://www.advocacyguru.com

For more see Green Opinions on Politics

On Thursday, April 17, 2008, the Michigan Student Sustainability Coalition and Global Exchange held a day of action at the state capitol in Lansing, Mi to push for strong renewable energy and energy efficiency legislation. The day of action called, “Re-New Michigan,” was aimed at the joint demand of reinvigorating the Michigan economy and confronting the climate crisis through the development of green industry in Michigan.

The “Re-New Michigan” day of action brought together 65 youth from around the state of Michigan ranging in age from elementary students to college graduates. The day of action included lobby meetings with the Michigan Senate and a rally at the west capitol lawn with speeches from: Erica Tauzer of Albion College, Danielle Ostafinski of Grand Valley State University, Michael Collins of Michigan State University, Sarah Mulkoff of Michigan State University, Brad Baughman of Alma College, Tremaine Phillips of Michigan State University, Ian Hoffback of Calvin College, Lee Sprague of the Sierra Club and Brandon Knight of Global Exchange. The Re-New Michigan day of action was in support of the M.S.S.C.’s Clean Energy Future Campaign that includes 5 demands from the Michigan Legislature:

1. Renewable energy standard (RES) of at least 25% by 2025.
2. Energy efficiency (EE) standard requiring 2% annual energy efficiency increases in this state between now and 2015, with a commitment to the renegotiation of a stronger standard after 2015.
3. Integrated Resource Planning (IRP), which would require state regulators to consider demand-side options like energy efficiency programs as well as supply-side options in their efforts to meet Michigan’s needs for energy, equity, and the environment.
4. A moratorium on new coal-fired and nuclear power plants in Michigan.
5. Low carbon fuel standards

“Michigan stands to benefit immensely from supporting a clean energy economy. We have the manufacturing base that can build the wind turbines, solar panels and clean cars that can reinvigorate the economy and build pathways out of poverty,” said Sarah Mulkoff of Michigan Student Sustainability Coalition. “Michigan has the opportunity to become a clean energy manufacturing powerhouse, and to bring green economy jobs to the region, and to help solve the climate crisis.”

“Our world is at a crossroads,” added Andrew Munn, coordinator of Michigan Student Sustainability Coalition. “The actions we take today as a society to address the challenge of climate change will determine the future of our generation and generations to come. The time has come for us to make a change.”

For more information on the Michigan Student Sustainability Coalition, please visit: www.groups.google.com/group/mssc_mi. For more information on the Re-New Michigan effort please visit: www.greenmi.org.

Michigan Student Sustainability Coalition Drops off 500 Valentines Cards to Michigan Legislature in Support for Clean Energy

At 10 a.m. on February 14th, 2008, the Michigan Student Sustainability Coalition held a press conference at the state capitol in Lansing, Mi to announce the launch of the Energy Future campaign and to drop off Valentines Day cards to members of the Michigan Legislature. The event included an opening address by Rep. Gabe Leland (D — Detroit), and speeches by Sue Browne of the Blue Green Alliance, Rep. Fred Miller (D- 31st District), Rep. Marie Donigan (D-Royal Oak), and Rep. Alma Wheeler Smith (D — 54th district). The M.S.S.C. had speeches from Chris Detjen, Erica Tauzer, Sarah Mulkoff and Tremaine Phillips. Members of the M.S.S.C. were also recognized on the house and Senate floor by Rep. Michael Sak (D — Distict 76) and Sen. Mark Schauer (D — district 19).

The M.S.S.C. dropped off the cards in conjunction with thousands of youth across the state that sent online Valentines Day cards to the state legislature over the past month through Cleanenergylove.com. The Valentines Day cards are in support of the Energy Future Campaign that includes 4 asks from the Michigan legislature:

1. A renewable energy standard (RES) of at least 25% by 2025.
2. Energy efficiency (EE) standard requiring 2% annual energy efficiency increases in this state between now and 2015, with a commitment to the renegotiation of a stronger standard after 2015.
3. Integrated Resource Planning (IRP), which would require state regulators to consider demand-side options like energy efficiency programs as well as supply-side options in their efforts to meet Michigan’s needs for energy, equity, and the environment.
4. A moratorium on new coal-fired power plants in Michigan.

“Think about our future as youth, both our economy and the places we will live in Michigan,” said Erica Tauzer of Michigan Student Sustainability Coalition. “Before we allow more dirty energy facilities to be built in Michigan, please recognize that in a few short years we will inherit these new facilities. We need the State Legislature to put policies in place that promote clean energy, job growth and a revitalization of the Michigan economy. Coal and nuclear facilities are old technology and we need to transition to clean sources of energy”

“Our world is at a crossroads,” added Tremaine Phillips, coordinator of Michigan Student Sustainability Coalition. “The actions we take today as a society to address the challenge of climate change will determine the future of our generation and generations to come. The time has come for us to make a change.”

For more information on the Michigan Student Sustainability Coalition, please visit: www.groups.google.com/group/mssc_mi. For more information on Valentines Card Campaign, please visit: www.cleanenergylove.com.

Paul Ogle at Voip-News contacted us about an interesting article at their site. It’s entitled “50 Ways to Leave Your Cell Phone” and it’s quite interesting. Take the time to find out how these things are related. You’ll be surprised. I know we were.

http://www.voip-news.com/feature/50-ways-leave-cellphone-011608/